VISITING PRACTITIONERS

‘Lindsay Wright’

Lindsay Wright is a British composer, her practice involves blending traditional orchestral elements with experimental methodologies.

‘The mystery of D.B. Cooper’-

This documentary focuses on the highjacking of a plane in the 1970’s, the documentary forwent investigating the perpetrator of the crime, rather it highlighted public obsession with the mystery. Lindsay’s brief for the documentary included many different elements, mainly a 70’s theme with modern sections.

Firstly, Wright talks about scoring the cue ‘attention all agents’. This is the moment the FBI agents are notified about the highjacking, moving from footage of police cars racing to the scene onwards to talking head interview elements. The cue begins with a classic 70’s cop drama style intro, with guitars violins and drums, the score then reduces in volume and frequency occupation to pave way for dialogue. These talking head sections were underscored with low frequency synthesisers (bringing in the modern influence) with drums maintaining the narrative intensity/pacing. Lindsay also made use of a key change to provide a sense of urgency and build, in her words an easier way to build tension without actually having to write anything new.

Write tried to give each person being interviewed their own musical identity. She talks about one person having a string belief that DB Cooper did not survive the crash. Scoring this Lindsay tried to give it a more ‘Fargo’ inspired sound, off kilter, curious and sometimes fun. This part of the scoring process highlighted the importance of creating more than one version for cues, as sometimes your scores don’t reflect the directors vision.

Lindsay talks about starting a composition with a few days dedicated to finding the right timbre or sound palette, to find the sonic identity of the piece. Sounds have themes in integral in their timbre, finding a good instrument to attach to a certain element of the narrative is an important part of the process.

‘Mudlarks’-

Mudlarks Is a film about two homeless girls living in a tent besides the thames, during the film one of the girls doesn’t come home from a s shift of finding money/food. The aims of the scoring was to highlight the girls relationship, and the anguish caused by one of their absence. Lindsay tried to capture the vastness of the city whilst also commenting on the intimacy of their relationship. They focused on gestural ideas, and built up textures, each they could reuse later in the film. EQ automation is a useful technique in building gestures, filling out the sound as the score grows. A quality the director wanted from the sound is a homemade feel, which was convenient as the budget only really afforded home studio recording. Lindsay talks about the importance of bringing in tones from the rest of the score into each cue, it gives the whole underscore a fluidity and solid sonic identity.

‘Lines’-

This was Wrights self made EP constructed during the first lockdown, the project was influenced by Patrick Jonsson, Angus McRae and Keaton Henson. Exile was a track inspired by moving from a busy street in south east London to a small town in Cambridgeshire, how moving gave her more space to think and work healthily. Other tracks inspired by peoples resilience to carry on working through the pandemic, also a reflection on some peoples negative experience such as her friend having to see his family though a glass window.

Musical Traits to consider when constructing a piece-

  • Timbre
  • Constant motion
  • Cyclical Layers
  • Texture
  • Rhythm
  • Harmony
  • Instrumentation
  • Structure
  • Slides
  • Bass
  • Space and Depth

VISITING PRACTITIONERS: PAMELA Z

ARS ELECTRONICA 2008; A NEW CULTURAL ECONOMY: Sonorous Embodiment- Gro§e Konzertnacht; Brucknerhaus – Pamela Z: voice and electronics. Foto: rubra

Pamela started her career as a composer/performer, expanding to many different facets of sound making later on in life. She is best known for performances in which she manipulates her voice using wireless gesture midi controllers. In the mid 1980’s, Pamela started manipulating her voice with outboard rigs of processors. Following years of spending lots of money and effort on transporting this rig, Pamela decided to patch her processors into software using MAX MSP. This method of manipulation is constantly evolving, adding and subtracting tools, however the manipulation essentially remains constant.

These voice manipulation pieces began life as 3-7 minute songs, as a means to begin concerts. The pieces eventually evolved into evening long works, often held together with visuals, allowing Pamela to explore different areas of manipulation.

‘Baggage allowance’ explores the concepts of baggage in literal and metaphorical senses, it was a multimedia installation containing sound, visuals, objects and a browser. This piece also took the form of a gallery installation, including video, ‘sonic luggage’, draws with sound, video and objects. Opening the draws would trigger different videos to play next to them.

‘Sonic gestures’ is a site specific installation in a very large room, it included 10 HD screens and 16 channels of audio. The piece became dormant due to galleries’ inability to present it, requiring lots of screens and multiple computers. Recent advances in technology have allowed the piece to be played from a single computer, making it easier to exhibit. I find this very interesting, how the life of a project can change and even be resurrected by changes in the world of technology, perhaps this could be true of culture and politics also.

‘Memory trace’ is constructed from interviews about memory Pamela conducted, the audio is chopped and stacked, it results in a chaotic experience for the listener, the conversations move in different directions very quickly. The different voices are binded by a synchronisation of expressions such as ‘Hmmmm I forget’. The piece was developed for a commission in which the voices are accompanied by a string quartet, repeating expressions and mimicking the melodic shifts of the speech. I appreciate the organic qualities of the chaos, voices interrupt each other. This reminds me of the director Noah Baumbach as they highlight the idea that natural speech is messy, people talk over each other, this subverts the feeling of a performance, and brings the organised narrative into reality.

Pamela’s work resonates with me because of her use of layering. She negates isolating phrases, instruments or voices in linear space, rather allowing these phrases to overlap, interrupt and conflict. This technique gives the audio a natural quality, imperfect and real. This organic quality is evident in her methods of manipulation, opting for gestural midi control, allowing for natural imperfect movements of the hand. Thirdly, it is evident in her emphasis on the voice, an instrument which lends itself to portamento and naturally negates harmonic segregation.

VISITING PRACTITIONERS

Asa Stjerna

Asa Stjerna is a sonic artist from Sweden, she uses listening as a method of exploration, these explorations are reworked and expressed through site specific installations. Asa explores sounds transformative quality, she uses sound as a means to transform experience of a site/situation. Sites/situation relates to environments, this could be the ocean, the weather etc. From Stjerna’s perspective, the small processes an artist does in the preparation to present their work are just as valuable as the end sonic result. These, she says, are affective inter relational processes, and engagement with the site. Stjerna emphasises the importance of looking at what is not yet in a space, how the space can be transformed into something else.

Asa presents her piece ‘The Well’, a permanent installation in the Swedish Institute in Paris. She installed a mono channel work inside the dried out well, she talk about engaging with the stone wall’s ‘agency’ as she puts it. She describes having a dialogue with the space in question, an experimental practice, an engagement with the space.

‘The Well’ (2014) – Asa Stjerna

Stjerna explains some points from her writings on transversal practices of sound installation:

  • Mapping the affective lines– The process of site specific exploration, this is what it means to find the space, researching the site engaging with archives etc. This is, for Asa, a very vivid/active engagement.
  • Establishing new connections– The artistic design process. Stjerna provides an example of installing a loudspeaker with a cable on a site, this is not just an action of laying a cable. It is engaging in a dialogue with the agencies of the space.
  • Becoming Non-Autonomous– It is important to understand your own situated perspective.

Recently Stjerna has become interested in the ocean as a public space. Asa next presents her work ‘Currents’ made in 2011. It was a site specific piece for the opera building in Oslo, the piece was based on scientific measurement data from the North-Atlantic current in the North Sea, this current Is associated with the melting of ice in the northern hemisphere. The piece was a signification of real-time data, this data was acquired at the floor near the Faroe Islands. Water flows past a cable inducing an electrical current, giving an indication of the oceanic current. The sound was generated using 4 data streams, the North Atlantic current, the semi-diurnal tide, the diurnal tide and the ionosphere. The slow patterns of energy from the tidal streams and the ionosphere where sped up 9 million times to make them audible. The tidal information was translated into drones, while the ionosphere was split into a granulated sound texture. The data from the North Atlantic current was used to control the textures and spatial positioning of the sounds. This was dispersed in the space through 22 loudspeakers.

Oslo Opera House

VISITING PRACTITIONERS

Lucia H Chung

Lucia H Chung (AKA ‘En Creux’) is a Taiwanese experimental audio artist based in London. Lucia began her talk by presenting a visual piece called ‘Tell me a story’, she describes the work as a reaction to the culture shock of moving to the UK. She was working with a small group of MA students in Winchester, Lucia was the only non-english speaker and as a result was quite shy and reserved. Lucia was interested in the ‘gap’ between translations, and how a person can get caught in that gap. Lucia would whisper something in mandarin to her partner, and the partner would whisper some English phrases back. This process was filmed with a two channel video set up, the absence of understanding was expressed clearly in their faces. During this time at Winchester, Lucia was primarily working with video to explore themes of communication, and the differences in personality when speaking different languages. She conducted a visual investigation on herself, filming herself speaking English, and then speaking Mandarin.

After these works Lucia started working more with sound in video. The piece Lucia showed was a film of her doing a full body prostration, a buddhist ritual that is repeated 108 times as a way of offering yourself or to repent. She was interested in the psychological transition from the first action to the 108th repetition, an ‘untranslatable mind space through a very physical repetition’. Lucia didn’t perform 108 repetitions, instead she edited the video to invoke the psychological mind space. She sped up and slowed down the footage, emphasising the frequency change in the audio.

Continuing her investigation into translation, Lucia found a researcher called  Sarat Maharaj. She quotes an article by the South African man,

‘There emerged, it seems to me, a notion of translation which activates both the visual and the sonic. Beyond the sense of the word and image are sounds which cannot be entirely drawn into the net of signification, and cannot be entirely decoded or deciphered as meaning this, that or the other. This larger sonic pause, the penumbra of the untranslatable that shadow and smudge language, and for which we have to venture beyond language.’

This quote gave Lucia the confidence to ditch visuals and focus on sound as a material medium. Lucia started her PHD at Goldsmiths, she was trying to understand what sound arts is. Lucia discovered Jacob Kirkegaard, a sound artist who had an interest in space. Lucia specifically talks about his piece ‘4 Rooms’, an art piece in which Jacob went to the zone of isolation in Chernobyl. He then recorded the ambient sound of 4 public spaces, he choses these spaces because of the public traffic they once hosted. The recording were then played into the room and rerecorded, repeating this process 10 times for each room, a technique pioneered by Alvin Lucier. Lucia appreciate the hidden dimension of the space Jacob was revealing, she equated this to her investigation in translation.

‘4 Rooms’ – Jacob Kirkegaard

Next Lucia presented a piece she created in 2009 called ‘Spring Piece’, an audio piece created at a time of transition for her. She had just moved to London, specifically New Cross, she recalled it as a horrible place with rats and an inordinate amount of noise created mainly by passing buses. She described how her room would shake when the busses drove past, which would happen very frequently. This was a stark contrast to the quant medieval town of Winchester. She recorded the sound of her room, and used a piezo microphone to play the recording through the single glazed Windows pane, then rerecording this. This was Lucia’s first sound piece.

Lucia takes a lot of inspiration from sculpture, and says she felt a lot more comfortable using sculpture as a medium. Although she was working with sound, she still hadn’t found a way to equate it to working with a physical medium. She then recalls the breakthrough moment when she made that connection. Lucia recalls seeing Whiteread’s piece ‘Ghost’, a casting of the inside of a living room. Its a piece displaying negative space, a casting and documentation of a living space. Lucia compares this to Alvin Lucier’s ‘Im sitting in a room’, equating the plaster in the casting of the room with Lucier’s mapping of the room with sound as a catalyst.

‘Ghost’ – Rachel Whiteread

VISITING PRACTITIONERS

Richard Phoenix

Richard Phoenix is an artist that works in paint, drawing, writing and music with an emphasis on how these things can help people be together. He works with autistic and people with learning disabilities, encouraging people to make and share art.

Richard started his artistic career when he was 16 playing in bands with his friends, he predominantly played the drums. These bands are where Richard came to value a DIY approach to creation, he values the idea that anyone is capable of becoming a musician and sharing their work. He sees it as an empowering process that helps communities and individuals overcome obstacles and achieve their goals.

In 2006 Richard moved to Brighton and started volunteering for an organisation called carousel that supported artists with learning disabilities. This was his first exposure to working with people who had learning disabilities. He recalls being blown away by a band called ‘Beat express’ who played at one of the gigs, and describes it as a lightbulb moment where he realised he had never seen bands with learning disabilities. This moment sparked 15 years of work, his aim is to get these bands the time and space they need to produce more music and play for more people. Richard started using the skills he had learned playing in DIY bands to support these new bands, putting on shows and recording. Richard started a night in Brighton called ‘rock house’ which gave time for these bands with learning disabilities to play every month, this night has been going for 10 years and is still going.

Richard fell in love with a Finnish punk band called PKN, and he was determined to get them to play in England. To do this he started an organisation called ‘Constant Flux’ in order to be eligible to apply for arts council funding, he managed to get £10,000 to bring them on tour. Phoenix describes the merging of working learning disabilities bands and DIY punk bands as a life changing experience, he managed to find a way to get these bands a diverse audience.

VIENNA, AUSTRIA – MAY 18: Pertti Kurikan Nimipaivat of Finnland performs during a rehearsal of the first Semin Final on May 18, 2015 in Vienna, Austria. The final of the Eurovision Song Contest 2015 will take place on May 23, 2015. (Photo by Nigel Treblin/Getty Images)

Richard later produced a one page print manifesto for Goldsmiths fringe and underground music group called ‘DIY as privilege- 13 point manifesto for musicians’. This was designed to talk directly to DIY music scenes, and to ask them to consider access within their scenes, to consider who is not in the room and what they can do about it. Richard started fundraisers to provide practice spaces, to transport people to and from the spaces, and to pay for shows. This lead to people with communication barriers being able to work together in order to write songs, Richard makes a point of saying that the money is used to provide structures that help people to do it themselves, this maintains agency and creative freedom.

The manifesto was later expanded and published for rough trade books. Here Richard included more personal stories from creative people that he knows, had worked with or supported. Richard clarifies that he is not speaking on behalf of disabled people, he is speaking on behalf of himself. The experiences he has had working in his field and putting on the events he has, as he says, shifted the way he sees the world and making music. This book was intended to share that knowledge with other people to try and influence their perspectives. Richard says that one of the big issues with disability is fear, fear of doing the wrong thing that stems from ignorance. This ignorance is put upon us and disability can be a very silent part of society.

‘Every art-form is intimately related to a type of life experience. The difference between chamber music and jazz is not one of quality, finesse, or virtuosity but two ways of life, which the people involved did not choose but were born into.’ – John Berger

I do think it’s too easy to be set in your own perceptions, due to our experience of life many people unknowingly have a solipsistic outlook. We should make the effort to consider others experiences and perceptions in the creative field. I’ve always been focused on the process of making and the only thing that matter to me is if like it. However I do think it’ll be interesting to explore the perception and origins of art, much like Sam Auinger talking about all of our perceptions of sound being different. Ive rented ‘Ways of seeing’ by John Berger from the library and Im going to give it a read, id like to see if it applies to my practice.

VISITING PRACTITIONERS

NikNak

Nicole Raymond AKA NikNak

Nicole studied music tech and innovation at DMU, her initial intention was to become a producer and make beats. She recalls experiencing a stark contrast between her practice and the course, she was focused on production techniques and practical work, whereas the introduction to her course was binaural meditation music. At the start, joining the course was a mistake in her eyes but it turned out to be a very formative time for her, which she touches on later in the talk.

Her most recent work was a residency for Sound Uk called ‘sound generator’. Raymond created an album of music with field recordings, she then presented it through an octo-phonic set up, it was a live performance triggering recordings while using a turntable. Raymond expresses her value of working in surround sound, there are few opportunities to work with it, namely university and gallery spaces. Both of which, Nicole states, have a limited crowd. Raymond is interested in bringing surround pieces to venues more familiar to the public, drawing a more diverse crowd.

Raymond presents a radio show for worldwide FM called ‘Melanin’, a show about black music irrespective of genre. Her aim is to play new artists and artists she has connected with, this is a kind of rebuttal against the pigeonholing of black artists to certain genres.

VISITING PRACTITIONERS

Cedrik Fermont

Cedrik begins the talk by recalling when he was teenager growing up in Belgium, he realised that he was one of the only people of colour in the industrial/punk music scenes, he also recalls being confused as to why this was and why his other friends from around the world were not involved in the scene. As Cedrik began to collect music he noticed he was mainly collecting music from the west, and almost none from Africa and Eastern Europe. To solve this Cedrik sen out flyers stating that he was looking for people in these countries that were interested in and making the same kind of music as him. It took months but he did get some answers, mainly people saying they knew someone that fit the description, but he had found people. This lead to Cedrik creating what he called ‘Human Archives: Vol 1’, it was a cassette tape containing a compilation of alternative electronic improvised music from around the world. This was done before the age of the internet, Cedrik says, it’s nothing compared to what we can do now in terms of global projects but back then it was very difficult. It was 25 artists and bands from 25 countries, Cedrik was pleased with this but thought he could do more, and was still wondering why he could not find more like minded artists especially in Asia and Africa.

In the early 2000’s with the help of the internet, Cedrik had an opportunity to dive deeper into his research into music from the non-western world. During this time he was studying the history of electro acoustic music in Belgium, and he noted the lack of Italian and Egyptian artists mentioned when talking about very early electroacoustic artists, the History being told was predominantly western. Continuing with his research, file sharing softwares became a very effective means of finding like minded music consumers from the east. Cedrik would find people from these non-western countries uploading vast catalogues of experimental electronic music. Cedrik thought that the best way for him to publish more of, and write about experimental music being made outside of the west, was to go to these places. In 2003 he got the opportunity to go to Istanbul, he managed to find someone who was organising experimental music concerts in Turkey, he performed in some of these concerts with varying success. He would either be playing for 25-30 people who tended to be musicians, or he would get kicked out venues because no-one thought it was music. A year later he got the opportunity to go to Thailand, he was put in touch with a composer who booked him to play in an art gallery. He found most people who attended he concert had not heard this type of music before but attended and stayed out of curiosity. In 2005 Cedrik toured around many countries in south east Asia, with a goal of meeting as many experimental artists as possible. He brought back a great number of records and cassettes with which he created another compilation album. This was a very important archive for Cedrik, as he was discouraged by people to even go to these countries, people would say he wouldn’t find anything. The album was named ‘Beyond ignorance and borders’, and he says it is ignorance to assume no-one outside of the west is making experimental electronic music. The archive is a rebuttal against the borders we have created, and that are maintained by the media, painting foreign countries as having no modern art (ex. Eastern Block). Cedrik documents these artists and scenes by recording audio, taking notes, interviewing, publishing music and playing artists on a radio show.

Cedrik asks himself, why is this part of history so unknown, and why is it not taught to people? Colonisation is the answer, he says, the west has put aside a large part of eastern artistic history. Cedrik is making an effort to update this history of electroacoustic music and sound art. He has created an online database with which people can access a list of artists/composers/labels organised by country.

ARCHIVE- http://syrphe.com/index.html

VISITING PRACTITIONERS

Sam Auinger

Sam began his talk by talking about his origins. He was born in 1956 in upper Austria. As a child he recognised that sound was basically information and music was social. This means that people needed the help of auditory information to function in their daily lives, Auinger gives the example of running a farmhouse. He recalls that his grandfather was famous for a practice of listening to the sound of hay in the summer to determine the weather. Sam later realised that he was listening to the moisture levels in the material, and with knowledge of the interdependencies between air pressure, materiality and weather was able to deduce the change of the weather. Sam provides another example of auditory information as a warning of people approaching, before CCTV he says they would rely on the sound of the geese. Auinger says that listening to the environment in any field was a daily practice, the sounds ‘talk’ to you. Bringing the same concept to the city, he says that the sounds are talking, but without any meaning for you.

Auinger describes a game he would play with his friends in his youth, one person would hide in a wooden hut to obscure their sight, and they would have to guess what type of car or truck passed by relying solely on sound. He says that each machine had a distinct sound, and this is the crux of his talk. He believes that it is getting harder and harder for people to rely on their ears.

Auinger talks about the catholic influence on his childhood, he recalls the mass being a huge event, and that the churches were built with the intention to enhance your experience, especially the architecture interacting with the sound of the organ. Certain types of cathedrals are even taking advantage of geographical location, making sure the sun hits a stain glass window at the time of the mass. They have used the ability of design to underline their message. But you can take this concept and apply it to all architecture, all buildings influence peoples psychology.

After studying economics and mathematics, Auinger studied composition and computer music in the 80s. There are many properties of sound we take as a given, Sam says, during in this study he learned how to describe the many different qualities that make up a sound and actually talk about it meaningfully. He would have to talk about an imagined sound in order to try to replicate it with computers. Here, he notes, he would quite often get stuck using sounds he already knew from traditional instruments. Sam equates this to trying to imagine a deep sea creature, and the fact that nothing we imagine can be weirder than what is actually in the sea. Certain principles of sound reoccur all over the soundscape, in different practices and sources. Much like evolution in sea creatures, there are structures and systems that form the way sound works. Through this line of enquiry he found psychoacoustics, realising that his body and listening apparatus reacts very differently than a microphone.

Through learning to program sounds Sam became interested in public spaces, because he realised how much daily life was influencing the way he perceived music. He provides the example of his mother hating the Rolling Stones with a passion when he was younger describing it as just noise, and later on in life, as his mothers life had changed, she grew to like it. Now she was able to decode the song structure, in the sixties when these songs were released, it was impossible for her to enjoy the music due to her upbringing on upper Austrian folk music. Auinger raises the question, how many systems are in play that influence our perception of sound?

An example of a system would be the shape of our ears, the shape enhances a certain type of frequency spectrum. A young healthy human has a listening range from 20 Hz to 20000Hz, so when Sam hits a pen against a glass almost all people will hear it, but his grandson will hear more overtones than him. Over time our ability to hear high frequency decreases, this produces a problem for our language centred society, language is constructed with vowels and consonants, our ability to hear consonants decrease as they are mostly found at 8-10 kilohertz. Auinger realises that he is missing quite a lot of his higher range of hearing, and he gives an example of how this effects his perception. If you were to imagine somewhere with a very lively nightlife, lots of people and talking, a lot going on, for a young person with healthy hearing they can perceive this as energy, something that enhances you. If an elder person listens to the same thing, there is a lot less frequency response in their hearing, so for them they perceive the same situation as stress. Another system that influences us, and for Auinger is the most important, is our personal history or context. He gives the example of some people skating in the parking lot of an office. If you are the skateboarder the sound means success or failure of a trick, or seeing a friend. If you are working in the office and have nothing to do with skateboarding you will perceive this sound as annoying. It is almost completely impossible to hear a sound in the same way as someone else. Another interesting point that Auinger brings up is that loudness steals space, for example walking in London on a busy road, you will perceive the other side of the road as a silent movie, the road acts as a border in space.

Auinger stresses the importance of learning how we listen, that it will give rise to many different avenues of research and will deepen your listening experience of the world.